The Riddle of Poetry by Jorge Luis Borges, or Borges: el misterio esencial: Conversaciones en universidades de los Estados Unidos – Ficciones by Jorge Luis Borges is included on The Bokklubben World Library’s Best 100 Books of All Time, while on The Greatest Books of All Time site you find it in 45th place – there are thousands of reviews on magnum opera from the aforementioned and other web pages on my blog https://realinibarzoi.blogspot.com/2025/09/do-you-have-any-feedback.html and YouTube channel
The Riddle of
Poetry by Jorge Luis Borges, or Borges: el misterio esencial: Conversaciones en
universidades de los Estados Unidos – Ficciones by Jorge Luis Borges is
included on The Bokklubben World Library’s Best 100 Books of All Time, while on
The Greatest Books of All Time site you find it in 45th place – there
are thousands of reviews on magnum opera from the aforementioned and other web
pages on my blog https://realinibarzoi.blogspot.com/2025/09/do-you-have-any-feedback.html and YouTube channel
9 out of 10
Jorge Luis
Borges https://realinibarzoi.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-garden-of-forking-paths-by-jorge.html is one of the greatest writers of
all time, although he is a bit cryptic, too sophisticated for me - however, The
Riddle of Poetry is much more accessible, for these are lectures in which he
explains…The Riddle of Poetry
Nevertheless,
he starts with modesty, by saying that he does not possess the secret, does not
know what the riddle is, indeed, he is so charming throughout the six lectures,
during which he often uses self-deprecating humor: ‘maybe this is my discovery,
but maybe I have read it somewhere’, words to that effect
One of the
poets that is quoted a few times, and yet, Magister Ludi Kingsley Amis https://realinibarzoi.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-letters-of-kingsley-amis-edited-by.html was very hard on the one who wrote
‘A thing of beauty is a joy forever’ I am biased and would rather take his word
above almost all else
‘Keats was a
boring, conceited, self-pitying, self-indulgent silly little fool, as well as
an incompetent, uninteresting, affected, salacious poet. He's still better than
Shelley, though. Shelley didn't have Keats's excuse of not knowing any better…’
Jorge Luis Borges would have had a dialogue on this subject, he comes across a
gentle luminary
Borges
mentions quite a few striking facts: ‘the apple does not have the taste within,
just like a human does not, the taste comes from the meeting’, this was not the
way he said, but then it is used when he states ‘if the lectures were any good,
then the audience has merits’ and it is extended to books in general
Readers have
a contribution- I am reminded of https://realinibarzoi.blogspot.com/2025/01/according-to-mark-by-penelope-lively.html According To Mark by Penelope Lively:
“the novelist has an infinity of choices, He chooses what is to happen, to
happens, and in what way he will relate what happens, the picture he constructs
is complete on its own terms”
Other
humorous aspects were: Borges talks of Don Quixote of…Kansas, the fact that he
had readers come to him to ask ‘why is so and so silent before answering?’ and
then Borges confesses ‘he had to think who so and so was and why was he silent,
but then answered that so and so was silent because we are silent before
answering’
The lecturer
refers to Shakespeare https://realinibarzoi.blogspot.com/2026/05/hamlet-by-william-shakespeare-is-one-of.html and the ‘uncouth’ use of coitus,
which is not used in common language – well, there were other times, now the
orange leader of the free world says fucking – but we find it in Shakespeare
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu