Blow-Up written and directed by Michelangelo Antonioni, Winner of the 1967 Palme d’Or and a classic - 10 out of 10
Blow-Up
written and directed by Michelangelo Antonioni, Winner of the 1967 Palme d’Or
and a classic
10 out of
10
This is a
dazzling, mesmerizing motion picture, one of the best ever made, a statement
that is still valid today, even if what we see on the screen may seem dated,
the fashion, cars, haircuts are not the same, evidently, still, this has the
magic that is eternal, it hypnotizes and it is ‘cool, after fifty six years…
We have
aspects that have changed, the apparent misogynist, or maybe just sexist
attitudes have not vanished, clearly, especially if we think places like Saudi
Arabia, Zambia (this may be the place with some draconian regulations, and if
it is not, well, mea culpa) but we live in a different era, it has to do with
progress
The hero is
Thomas aka excellent David Hemmings, a photographer who is so damn successful
that he drives a Rolls Royce (or maybe it is a Bentley, but we are talking of
the most expensive cars money can buy, especially back then) and he is not
crowded exactly, but looked for by women who want to be his models
Some scenes
describe, show the audience what happens in these artistic circles, how
photographs are taken, the way models pose, the Creator - for we can assimilate
the photographer with a small god, one who makes or breaks a celebrity, money
spinner – takes a rather arrogant pose, abusive for our standards
A couple of
girls come to the studio, almost begging to be noticed, but the Man says he
‘does not have time, he did not have time to have his appendix taken care of’,
and the way he treats the other women, the ones working with me, where to
begin, it would not be allowed today outside Riyadh, Lusaka – only joking!
‘Power
corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’ – so goes one of those silly
proverbs, which by the way, are mostly dumb, off, inaccurate, let us just mention
‘all is fair in love and war’, which is so self-evidently stupid, and
‘appearances deceive’, debunked by a classic of psychology, by Malcolm Gladwell
In Blink,
The Power of Thinking Without Thinking http://realini.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-malcolm-gladwell-quicklet-bundle-by.html Malcolm Gladwell looks at the Thin
Slicing Effect and the way humans form opinions, make decisions, within
seconds, a habit formed over millennia of evolution, the fight or flight
response
Those who
could not react in a flash, could not get food – well, vegetarians could take
their time, probably, but hunters not really – and, just as important, would
become the meal for a predator, if they spend precious seconds musing about the
peril, and not running for their lives, the genes we have have been passed by
the quick ones
The photographer
has found his calling, which by the way is to be located by establishing three
groups, one with the things you like, another with the ones you are good at,
and the last will have the ones that have meaning for you, and when you look
for the domain where they intersect, this is where your calling is
Harvard
Professor Tal-Ben Shahar talks about this in his lectures, he has had the most
popular courses http://realini.blogspot.com/2017/07/positive-psychology-on-youtube-by.html in the history of that Ivy League
institution, and you could find his wonderful advice, stories from Jewish
tradition online…
When Thomas
is in the park, he sees a couple kissing, playing somehow together, in a sort
of foreplay maybe, or is just a cover for an attack – this could be some
spoiler alert right here, something using hindsight, we see what follows and
then look back and say, oh, maybe they were not really displaying affection
The
protagonist takes pictures, and would say when confronted that this is what he
does, it is his job, but the protest is that this ‘is a public space’, people
are allowed to move about without someone interfering, so that would be just
one of the questions, provocations, who is right, the man or the woman?
Vanessa
Redgrave is now an iconic figure, not just an artist, but as far as I can
remember (but could be dead wrong) vocal on various political issues (I may confound
her with Glenda Jackson, recently deceased, and once a member of Parliament)
and I must say, not one of my favorite artists, although I see how remarkable
she has been
She is Jane
in this film, and the one having the interaction in the park, after which she
comes to challenge the photographer, asking for the photos, then continuing and
getting closer to him…looking at the pictures he had taken in the park, the
hero or anti-hero is trying to decipher what it is in there
And there
is a dead man, when he travels back to ‘the scene of the crime’, indeed, there
is a corpse there, but instead of calling the police, staying way clear of the
body, he does none of those things, which we know are necessary, surely from
watching so many movies with the details of detective work
You need a
perimeter around the place, they can take DNA samples now - not in 1967, but
still, it seems rather careless, albeit this is not really one of those
thrillers, where we are focused on who dunnit, here there are other, probably more
important happenings, this is also a ‘mood piece’, that drives you into the
drama… http://realini.blogspot.com/2018/01/lavventura-by-michelangelo-antonioni.html
Now for a
question, and invitation – maybe you have a good idea on how we could make more
than a million dollars with this http://realini.blogspot.com/2022/02/unique-in-world.html?q=unique+in+the+world – as it is, this is a unique technique, which
we could promote, sell, open the Oscars show with or something and then make
lots of money together, if you have the how, I have the product, I just do not
know how to get the befits from it, other than the exercise per se
As for my
role in the Revolution that killed Ceausescu, a smaller Mao, there it is http://realini.blogspot.com/2022/03/realini-in-newsweek-participant-in.html
Some
favorite quotes from To The Heritage and other works
‘Fiction is
infinitely preferable to real life...As long as you avoid the books of Kafka or
Beckett, the everlasting plot of fiction has fewer futile experiences than the
careless plot of reality...Fiction's people are fuller, deeper, cleverer, more
moving than those in real life…Its actions are more intricate, illuminating,
noble, profound…There are many more dramas, climaxes, romantic fulfillment,
twists, turns, gratified resolutions…Unlike reality, all of this you can
experience without leaving the house or even getting out of bed…What's more,
books are a form of intelligent human greatness, as stories are a higher order
of sense…As random life is to destiny, so stories are to great authors, who
provided us with some of the highest pleasures and the most wonderful
mystifications we can find…Few stories are greater than Anna Karenina, that
wise epic by an often foolish author…’
‚parturiunt
montes, nascetur ridiculus mus’
“From Monty
Python - The Meaning of Life...Well, it's nothing very special...Try and be
nice to people, avoid eating fat, read a good book every now and then, get some
walking in, and try and live together in peace and harmony with people of all
creeds and nations.”
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu